Editorial Policy

EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE & FAIRNESS

Editorial Independence, Fairness & Scientific Excellence

Upholding impartial, transparent, ethical, and scientifically rigorous editorial practices in the advancement of medical and public health research.

OUR EDITORIAL PRINCIPLE

Commitment to Independent and Equitable Editorial Decisions

The journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of editorial independence, fairness, transparency, integrity, and scientific excellence. Every manuscript is considered through an objective and rigorous editorial process designed to uphold the credibility, quality, and integrity of scholarly publishing.

MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION

Merit-Based Scholarly Assessment

Manuscripts are evaluated on their scholarly and scientific merit. Editorial assessment is guided by the quality and integrity of the work rather than by the personal characteristics, institutional status, or background of the authors.

Depending on the nature of the submission, particular consideration is given to the following core criteria:

01

Originality

The originality and scholarly contribution of the submitted work are carefully considered.

02

Scientific Quality

Scientific soundness, relevance, clarity, and contribution to the field are assessed.

03

Methodological Rigor

Research design, methods, analytical procedures, and methodological appropriateness are considered.

04

Statistical Validity

Where applicable, statistical methods, analyses, interpretation, and reporting are assessed for validity and appropriateness.

05

Ethical Compliance

Compliance with relevant research ethics, publication ethics, and responsible scholarly practices is required.

06

Scholarly Contribution

The potential contribution of the manuscript to medicine, biomedical science, and public health is considered.

EQUAL AND IMPARTIAL CONSIDERATION

Non-Discrimination in Editorial Decisions

Editorial decisions are made without discrimination based on nationality, institutional affiliation, gender, ethnicity, religion, political ideology, or other personal characteristics unrelated to the scholarly merits of the manuscript.

EDITORIAL AUTONOMY

Protecting Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are expected to remain independent of inappropriate commercial, personal, institutional, political, or external influence. Editors and reviewers are expected to exercise professional judgment based on the scholarly merits of each submission.

The integrity of the editorial process takes precedence over personal, institutional, commercial, or external interests.

TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY

A Transparent and Responsible Process

The journal is committed to maintaining a transparent editorial process in which manuscripts are handled consistently, responsibly, and in accordance with established editorial and peer-review policies.

Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to uphold the principles of confidentiality, fairness, integrity, accountability, and respect throughout the publication process.

Our Commitment to Scientific Excellence

Through independent editorial judgment, equitable assessment, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and transparent scholarly practices, the journal seeks to uphold the highest standards of academic publishing and contribute meaningfully to medicine, biomedical science, and public health.

Advancing Medical Science, Improving Lives, Promoting Global Health.